Helping Gen Z Survive an Unstable Job Market

In September 2026, Fortune highlighted MIT Sloan professor emeritus Paul Osterman's finding that 35% of the American workforce, more than 55 million people, now works in "disposable" arrangements: freelance, contract, gig, or marginal W-2 roles where advancement isn't part of the deal. For Gen Z clients walking into a social worker's office, that number reframes the conversation.

Osterman's survey of 6,000+ adults found career ambition hasn't shifted generationally. What's shifted is the labor market itself. Reading a client's anxiety, burnout, or job-hopping as a values problem misses the structural reality shaping their options, and it produces the wrong intervention plan.

The Labor Market Shift Behind Gen Z's Job Insecurity

More than 6,000 U.S. adults participated in Paul Osterman's comprehensive workforce study, which included nearly 100 in-depth interviews examining how employment has transformed over recent decades. Osterman, professor emeritus at the MIT Sloan School of Management, published these findings in his book "Disposable Workers: The Transformation of Employment," providing social workers with essential context for understanding the future of social work skills and why so many young clients struggle to find stable footing in the labor market.

Young Workers' Attitudes Are Not the Problem

One of Osterman's most significant findings directly challenges a common narrative: the desire for a "real job" and meaningful career has remained stable across generations. Gen Z workers are not less committed or more entitled than their predecessors. The labor market itself has fundamentally changed around them, creating conditions where even motivated, educated workers find themselves marginalized into precarious positions. Daniel Zhao, chief economist at Glassdoor, confirms that Gen Z remains just as committed to career growth as previous generations, despite facing a sluggish hiring environment where workers feel stuck.

The Historical Fracture

Osterman traces this transformation to the breakdown of the postwar labor "accord," the implicit social contract between employers and workers that once promised stability, advancement, and mutual loyalty. He identifies President Reagan's 1981 firing of striking air traffic controllers as a pivotal inflection point. That moment signaled to employers nationwide that workers were expendable, accelerating the shift toward contingent, temporary, and "marginal" employment arrangements that now define much of the economy. According to Fortune's reporting on Osterman's research, this shift has been building for decades.

Reframing Clinical Assessment

This historical and structural context matters profoundly for social work practice. When a young adult client presents with anxiety about career instability, difficulty maintaining employment, or frustration about being unable to "get ahead," the instinct to focus on individual deficits or skill gaps misses the bigger picture. Job insecurity is often a structural condition, not a personal failing. Effective social work career assessment requires recognizing when a client's struggles reflect systemic labor market dysfunction rather than individual pathology, shaping interventions accordingly.

The Rise of 'Disposable Work': The Numbers Social Workers Should Know

MIT Sloan professor emeritus Paul Osterman surveyed more than 6,000 U.S. adults and conducted roughly 100 interviews for his book, Disposable Workers: The Transformation of Employment. The findings reframe how social workers should understand client employment struggles: the problem is structural, not generational.

Related Articles

How Job Insecurity Affects Gen Z Mental Health and Identity

Reading a young client's exhaustion as a character flaw is very different from reading it as a rational response to an unstable labor market, and the distinction changes everything about how a social worker intervenes.

The Burnout Signal

Glassdoor chief economist Daniel Zhao has tracked a sharp rise in burnout language across employee reviews, with mentions climbing by double digits year over year.¹ Zhao also describes hiring as "stuck": openings are scarce, promotions are slow, and workers who might otherwise leave a bad fit feel trapped. Exact percentages have shifted across different reporting periods, so practitioners should treat any single figure as a snapshot rather than a fixed benchmark. What matters clinically is the trend: burnout language is rising alongside a labor market that offers fewer visible paths forward.

Not Lazy, Just Locked Out

Zhao has pushed back directly on the "lazy Gen Z" narrative, noting that younger workers remain just as committed to building a career as prior generations. McKinsey's workplace research supports this: Gen Z respondents report higher concern about employment stability than the broader workforce, and are more likely to say their pay does not support a decent quality of life. These are not attitude problems. They are responses to real gaps between effort and reward.

Identity, Anxiety, and Quiet Quitting

Early adulthood is when identity, competence, and belonging get built largely through work. When that footing is unstable, generalized anxiety and diffuse self-doubt often follow, even without a clinical mood disorder present. Quiet quitting fits this pattern: doing only what is required is frequently a boundary-setting response to disposable treatment, not disengagement from ambition.

Assessment Implications

Clinicians should slow down before defaulting to a depression or anxiety diagnosis when a client's distress traces cleanly to job precarity, contract instability, or fear of being let go without warning. Situational stress rooted in labor conditions calls for coping tools, advocacy, and concrete planning. Clinical depression or anxiety, when present alongside these stressors, still needs standard treatment, but conflating the two risks missing the structural piece entirely.

Core Social Work Roles: Career Coaching, Advocacy, and Emotional Support

What can a social worker actually do in a session when a client shows up anxious about a contract that just ended or ashamed of cobbling together gig shifts to pay rent?

The answer spans three overlapping roles, each with concrete, session-ready applications.

Career Coaching as a Clinical Skill

Career coaching is no longer the exclusive domain of HR professionals or university career centers. Social workers supporting Gen Z clients can integrate practical employment skills directly into sessions:

• Resume reframing: Help clients translate fragmented gig and contract experience into a coherent narrative. A client who drove for a rideshare platform, freelanced on design projects, and worked seasonal retail has demonstrated adaptability, client management, and deadline discipline. Name those competencies out loud.
• Interview preparation: Role-play common interview questions in session. Use motivational interviewing techniques to help clients articulate their strengths without minimizing nontraditional work histories.
• Stigma reduction: Directly challenge the internalized belief that contract or gig work signals failure. Remind clients that, as MIT professor emeritus Paul Osterman's research shows, roughly 35% of the American workforce now falls into "disposable" work categories. The problem is structural, not personal.

Advocacy and Resource Connection

Social workers, particularly those with a community advocacy and social policy degree, are uniquely positioned to bridge the gap between a struggling client and the systems designed to help them:

• Benefits navigation: Walk clients through unemployment insurance eligibility, SNAP applications, and state workforce development programs they may not know exist, and use food insecurity screening tools for social workers when benefits fall short.
• Worker misclassification: When a client describes being treated like an employee but paid as a 1099 contractor, connect them to legal aid organizations that handle wage theft and misclassification claims.
• Rights education: Spend five minutes in a session reviewing a client's right to overtime, meal breaks, or protected leave. Many young workers have never been told.

Emotional Support in Session

Job insecurity triggers real clinical concerns: sleep disruption, identity confusion, relational strain, and chronic anxiety. Practitioners can:

• Normalize the emotional weight of instability rather than treating it as disproportionate worry.
• Build distress tolerance skills, drawing from DBT or ACT frameworks, so clients can sit with uncertainty without spiraling.
• Address shame directly by asking, "What does it mean to you that you don't have a traditional job right now?" Then gently separate the labor market reality from the client's self-worth.

These are not abstract competencies. Each one can be practiced in a single 50-minute session, starting tomorrow.

Practice Frameworks and Intervention Models for Job Insecurity

The tension every practitioner faces here is speed versus durability: a client needs something workable this week, but the underlying instability won't resolve in a single session. Traditional unemployment casework was built around one event: a layoff, a benefits application, a job-search plan with an endpoint. Job insecurity has no endpoint. A client can be technically employed, cycling through gig platforms or short-term contracts, and still need the same sustained support as someone out of work entirely.

A staged model built for precarity, not just job loss

The 5Es model, adapted from the International Labour Organization's youth employment framework, gives social workers a structure for this reality. Where the original framework centers four pillars, employability, equal opportunity, employment creation, and entrepreneurship, the social work perspective on the 5Es model adapts that structure by adding a fifth: ecological connection, meaning attention to family, community, and institutional systems around the client. That fifth piece matters because a client's instability is rarely just a resume problem. It's tied to housing, transportation, caregiving demands, and the policies of the employers or platforms they work for.

This is a conceptual model, not a session-by-session script, and there's no controlled trial testing it directly. But it reframes the work correctly: the goal isn't just landing a job, it's building resilience against a labor market that keeps generating unstable roles.

What the outcome data actually shows

Broader social work research and practice on youth employment offers modest but real signals. Reviews of youth employment programs spanning dozens of countries report positive results in roughly three-quarters of cases,¹ with employment probability gains in the range of 12 to 26 percent and earnings gains of similar magnitude.² Intensive, multi-component interventions for disconnected young people show smaller but measurable employment gains.³ None of these studies isolate underemployment or job quality specifically, so social workers should treat these numbers as encouraging direction, not guarantees for any individual client.

Adapting for remote and gig-economy clients

For clients without a physical workplace, the model needs practical scaffolding: structured daily routines to replace the rhythm an office once provided, scheduled check-ins to counter isolation, and explicit conversations about income volatility and benefits gaps.

Sequencing across an engagement

Start with stabilization (basic needs, routine), move to employability work (skills, applications), then address systemic barriers, and revisit all three stages regularly rather than closing the case after one placement.

A Staged Framework for Supporting Job-Insecure Clients

Supporting Gen Z clients through job insecurity requires a structured, sequential approach that accounts for the realities of today's labor market. The framework below adapts the World Bank's eight-stage employment program design model into a practitioner-friendly sequence. At each stage, note the branching considerations for clients in gig, contract, or "disposable" W-2 roles versus those in traditional employment.

Collaborating With Employers, Educators, and Policymakers

Individual coping strategies only go so far when the problem sits at the systems level. Social workers who want to make a lasting dent in Gen Z job insecurity need to work upstream, alongside the institutions that create and perpetuate marginal work.

Partnering with HR and organizational leadership

Practitioners in macro social work can approach HR departments directly, proposing policies that convert "marginal worker" arrangements into pathways with real advancement, benefits, and voice in workplace decisions. This might mean auditing job classifications, pushing for transparent promotion timelines, or building mentorship structures for contract and contingent staff. Organizational social workers and employee assistance program consultants are well positioned to make this case, framing inclusion policies as retention and productivity investments rather than pure altruism.

Educator and field placement collaboration

MSW programs and campus career centers should be natural allies. Field placements that connect students with workforce development agencies, union partnerships, or reentry employment programs build practitioner skill while filling a real service gap. Schools of social work can also formalize relationships with career services offices so students graduating into unstable labor markets get coordinated support rather than fragmented, one-off referrals.

Policy advocacy at the macro level

This is squarely the domain of political social work: living wage campaigns, gig worker classification reform (given that true gig work is a small slice of the disposable-labor picture), and modernizing unemployment insurance systems that were never built for contract or intermittent work. Social workers bring assessment and lived-experience data to these campaigns that economists and legislators often lack.

Grounding this in CSWE competencies

None of this is a stretch beyond core training. The 2022 Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards, the operative framework through 2026, directly name this work.¹ Competency 2, Advance Human Rights and Social, Racial, Economic, and Environmental Justice, calls for evaluating structural inequality and advocating across every level of practice. Competency 5, Engage in Policy Practice, is the clearest mandate for the living-wage and classification-reform work described above. Competency 3's focus on anti-racism, diversity, equity, and inclusion applies wherever job insecurity intersects with race, disability, or immigration status, which it frequently does. CSWE's Curricular Guide for Economic Well-being Practice ties all of this together, treating employment stability as a justice issue woven through every competency rather than a niche specialty.²

Career Outlook and Salary Context for Social Workers in This Space

Social workers who specialize in supporting job-insecure populations, including Gen Z clients navigating unstable labor markets, enter a field with solid demand and competitive wages. The Bureau of Labor Statistics projects 6% growth for social workers overall between 2025 and 2035, with roughly 69,100 annual openings nationally. Mental health and substance abuse social workers, a category closely aligned with the emotional toll of workforce instability, are projected to grow even faster at 9.7% between 2024 and 2034. The broader community and social service occupations category is expected to add more than 212,000 jobs over the same period. Below is a snapshot of national employment and salary data across key social work specializations, drawn from 2025 federal wage statistics.